The Future of Fuse boards...? | Page 6 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss The Future of Fuse boards...? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

The non-combustible enclosure or cabinet must provide a complete envelope (e.g. base,
cover, door and any components such as hinges, screws and catches) as necessary to
maintain fire containment.

Sealing of wiring entries
It is important for the installer to seal all openings into the enclosure or cabinet for cables,
conduits, trunking or ducting that remain after the installation of cables. See Figure 6.
The intent of the sealing is that, as far as is reasonably practicable, any fire is contained
within the enclosure or cabinet and the escape of flames to the surroundings of the cabinet or
enclosure or into conduits trunking or ducting is minimised, as intended by Regulation
421.1.201.
Good workmanship and proper materials must be used, and account must be taken of the
manufacturer’s relevant instructions, if any




Your opinion obviously differs from the IET who are involved in actually writing the regs to which you quote.
Can you quote where in that Regulation it cites any of this.
 
I get people's concerns, but this debate is theoretical (having been sparked by images from a studio set). It seems as though everyone involved is seeing something different in their mind's eye.
I'd like to know the true figures for overheating Consumer Units resulting in the spread of fire in a home, there are many warning signs before that stage would be reached, in my view dodgy connections under floorboards or in lofts have resulted in far more fires over the years.
 
So you can't then because it doesn't.
Are you saying that the IET didnt publish that ??

They clearly say :
The intent of the sealing is that, as far as is reasonably practicable, any fire is contained
within the enclosure or cabinet and the escape of flames to the surroundings of the cabinet or
enclosure or into conduits trunking or ducting is minimised, as intended by Regulation
421.1.201.
 
Are you saying that the IET didnt publish that ??

They clearly say :
The intent of the sealing is that, as far as is reasonably practicable, any fire is contained
within the enclosure or cabinet and the escape of flames to the surroundings of the cabinet or
enclosure or into conduits trunking or ducting is minimised, as intended by Regulation
421.1.201.

They did indeed state this in Special Edition II 2015 and nowhere else since that date - not even subsequent editions of The Wiring Regulations.

One might reasonably ask if this was their intent, why it was never included regulations?
 
The problem with the IET is they contradict themselves. See the Q and A's of this article:


Very confusing.
 
Are you saying that the IET didnt publish that ??

They clearly say :
The intent of the sealing is that, as far as is reasonably practicable, any fire is contained
within the enclosure or cabinet and the escape of flames to the surroundings of the cabinet or
enclosure or into conduits trunking or ducting is minimised, as intended by Regulation
421.1.201.
At no point did I suggest this so can you show where in that Regulation or anywhere in BS7671 is any of that stated.
 
The question is [as you know] where is all that written within BS7671.
It's obviously their interpretation of the quoted reg by the people who actually wrote it.
At no point did I suggest this so can you show where in that Regulation or anywhere in BS7671 is any of that stated.
I am simply quoting what they said, I suggest you take it up with them instead of trying to give me the 3rd degree 😁
 
It's obviously their interpretation of the quoted reg by the people who actually wrote it.

I am simply quoting what they said, I suggest you take it up with them instead of trying to give me the 3rd degree 😁

You're quoting from an interview with someone who helped write BS7671 and not a consensus among the many people involved.

Since one individual espoused this view in 2015, there have been a number of subsequent editions of wiring regulations in which it could have been included. That it hasn't been included might be an indication of others not being in agreement. No matter, it seems odd that such clarification (if that's what we're taking it to be) has been omitted from successive editions - if indeed the IET's position was ever such.
 
It's obviously their interpretation of the quoted reg by the people who actually wrote it.

I am simply quoting what they said, I suggest you take it up with them instead of trying to give me the 3rd degree 😁
I am a member of the IET and totally disagree with it.
 

Reply to The Future of Fuse boards...? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
378
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
951
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

For a TN system neutral is deemed at earth potential.
Replies
6
Views
375
In the picture of the socket, it looks like one of the neutrals may have been screwed in over the insulation. Therefore, the live may also have...
    • Like
Replies
14
Views
748

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top