General Election 2015 poll

  • Conservative

    Votes: 13 26.0%
  • Labour

    Votes: 4 8.0%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 23 46.0%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 2 4.0%
  • SNP

    Votes: 2 4.0%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • other

    Votes: 4 8.0%
  • Not voting this time

    Votes: 1 2.0%

  • Total voters
    50
IMO what we need is a government focused on prosperity, not austerity. One that will not punish the unemployed, the poor and sick for being unemployed, poor or sick

So you are happy for people to get £26K tax free when you are earning this, for 40 hours AND paying tax and NI??

600K+ people came to England, and found work. This means 600K brits have the excuse to do nothing.

If I was in charge, I would progressively reduce all unemployment benefits, over time until work paid.
 
Its not just dole now , how many people are living on other benefits in form or another , ask yourself the question why have people became apathetic to politics and why is the turnout lower than it used to be many years ago , the answer is that they are not being listened to , old labour were at least for the people ,where now they are a mess , you can see why UKIP is gaining popularity and the price for doing so is to be ridiculed by the other parties....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you are happy for people to get £26K tax free when you are earning this, for 40 hours AND paying tax and NI??

600K+ people came to England, and found work. This means 600K brits have the excuse to do nothing.

If I was in charge, I would progressively reduce all unemployment benefits, over time until work paid.

No, of course I'm not happy to have people languishing on the dole, my point is though that the problem is much lower than our government would like us to believe. What I'm also not happy with is the demonisation of the people I mentioned.
 
ha ha ha.

I heard Ming Campbell a short while ago, on the radio saying he thought that Nicola Sturgeon, last night, reminded him of Margaret Thatcher!
 
ha ha ha.

I heard Ming Campbell a short while ago, on the radio saying he thought that Nicola Sturgeon, last night, reminded him of Margaret Thatcher!

*********** WHAT !!!! - ONLY IN A PARALLEL UNIVERSE, where NS is the anti-matter. Actually she could be quite good for UK politics , if I wasn't the crap content that she purports
 
*********** WHAT !!!! - ONLY IN A PARALLEL UNIVERSE, where NS is the anti-matter. Actually she could be quite good for UK politics , if I wasn't the crap content that she purports

In a perverse way I quite like her approach. No messing, no playing for the soundbites. What you hear, is what you always hear ...... unlike MOST of the others!
 
Benefit culture does indeed exist. It is alive and well in my area in Scotland. BUT the area boasts high unemployment, Bad public transport and there are very few local jobs. Now what is the answer ? Do you want the guy to move to the south east of England to find work ? Plenty have done it (I worked down there for 13 years and had a great time.) Anyway so say the young eager bright all move south....What happens next ? Tons of empty houses up north and a housing and infrastructure crisis in the south. Sound familiar ?
So no im afraid the answers are not a simple "Get on your bike" - the fact of life is some areas of the country are depressed areas. These areas need government funding to attract businesses to the areas THEN we can say to the long term unemployed - get back to work lads.
Coupled with better education, apprenticeships, training programs ect ect ect...all this needs addressing before we start looking into telling people that there are jobs available for all.....will never happen of course.
 
Benefit culture does indeed exist. It is alive and well in my area in Scotland. BUT the area boasts high unemployment, Bad public transport and there are very few local jobs. Now what is the answer ? Do you want the guy to move to the south east of England to find work ? Plenty have done it (I worked down there for 13 years and had a great time.) Anyway so say the young eager bright all move south....What happens next ? Tons of empty houses up north and a housing and infrastructure crisis in the south. Sound familiar ?
So no im afraid the answers are not a simple "Get on your bike" - the fact of life is some areas of the country are depressed areas. These areas need government funding to attract businesses to the areas THEN we can say to the long term unemployed - get back to work lads.
Coupled with better education, apprenticeships, training programs ect ect ect...all this needs addressing before we start looking into telling people that there are jobs available for all.....will never happen of course.

You will be pretty safe from the influx then.

The strange thing about this free movement around the EU, is that the "clever" people from the poorer countries will almost certainly move for work, which will inturn leave their homelands poorer.. meaning more people will leave the country......

Not sure how you can stop it!
 
The ****less idle who live on the dole are a bit of a red herring. The fact is that most claimants of welfare are employees who recieve poor wages from greedy employers unwilling to pay a fair wage, the government is then forced to top up the low wage in the form of tax credits. If employers were no longer subsidised and made pay a fair wage then the welfare budget could be slashed.
 
You will be pretty safe from the influx then.

The strange thing about this free movement around the EU, is that the "clever" people from the poorer countries will almost certainly move for work, which will inturn leave their homelands poorer.. meaning more people will leave the country......

Not sure how you can stop it!

Well I have hinted at how to stop it within the UK - Invest in the deprived area PROPERLY.
We need more schools ? Build them
We need more teachers ? Bloody well train more and make the position more attractive
Need more doctors and Gp's ? Train within our country
BUT BUT BUT all of that takes cash and we are in a recession....Well scrap HS" and scrap trident for a start.
We desperately need more power stations - Build them with government money funded by a super tax on the energy companies....As they don't seem to be using the resources given to them to do this.
All of that takes cash...Yes there is debt, There has ALWAYS been debt. Every western country runs on debt and have done for 100 years.
Ask yourself this. What would you rather leave your future generations ? A society that educates all to a acceptable standard. A health service that works and most importantly a future proof energy supply. If you leave them that you may leave them high tax's and debt - Or you could let everything decline to the stage where private companies and insurance industry control ALL of the above with the chance of insecure energy supply and low tax's. I think essentially the argument boils down to your outlook.
These things are not being discussed during this election..and they bloody well should be. But mark my words we will be discussing them in future elections.
 
The ****less idle who live on the dole are a bit of a red herring. The fact is that most claimants of welfare are employees who recieve poor wages from greedy employers unwilling to pay a fair wage, the government is then forced to top up the low wage in the form of tax credits. If employers were no longer subsidised and made pay a fair wage then the welfare budget could be slashed.

Yep this is a massive problem. One that needs deep thought to work out. Because you cant just stop the in work benefits without something in its place. Maybe a much higher minimum wage ? Some clever bod needs to work ot how much it costs region by region to "live". What it costs to eat/heat and shelter someone pluss 10% pocket money. Divide that up into a wage and go from there.
Obviously its not that easy but something has to give - will prices go up ? Probably. Will shareholder loose out ? probably. Will pensions be effected ? Yep. But we really will have to start looking at this stuff.
The answers to the worlds problems do not lie in big business leeching cheap labour and tax payers subsidizing them to turn a profit...if we are a market driven economy then do it properly - its time we stopped subsidizing multi national companies - If there is demand for a product/service then there will always be someone wanting to supply...time to stop the big tax breaks ect.
 
The Kingfisher Group experienced a 7% drop in profits recently.
To put that in perspective, for every hundred quid they profited last year they ONLY (?) profited £93 this year (obviously the chronology is wrong but I'm sure you get the gist)
Their answer is to announce the closure of something like 60 outlets. How many jobs are going to be lost?
**** like this should be illegal
 
The Kingfisher Group experienced a 7% drop in profits recently.
To put that in perspective, for every hundred quid they profited last year they ONLY (?) profited £93 this year (obviously the chronology is wrong but I'm sure you get the gist)
Their answer is to announce the closure of something like 60 outlets. How many jobs are going to be lost?
**** like this should be illegal

**** like this should be illegal.

Don't be so stupid
 
This is why I really don't understand socialists / lefties approach to dealing with business in a capitalist global economy. Anybody on here who is self employed / runs a business has exactly the same issues to deal with as a Kingfisher except a plc has one big disadvantage, it can be bought outright. I don't know about anybody else but I do make cuts to my costs every year, whether it be my energy costs, insurance costs, scam membership, banking etc etc. So as I cut my suppliers get less and also need to cut etc etc. This is necessary to keep me competitive and make sure I can generate a profit to keep Mrs P&S in the luxury she has become used to. If a Kingfisher has incurred a profits drop, then there will be a view as to whether it is run properly or not and ultimately the management can be replaced / or more worryingly it can be bought outright by a Carrefour for example. This is why business has to be supported and encouraged in the UK as its business that employs people and paying NI, pensions and CT and those employees pay tax, NI and spend money hence VAT.
Lefties kill this all stone dead, they should never be in power in a Global capitalist system, its a way too dangerous world for idealistic (wouldn't the world be great if)..... ideas that simply don't work. VOTE TORY its our only hope.
 
This is why I really don't understand socialists / lefties approach to dealing with business in a capitalist global economy. Anybody on here who is self employed / runs a business has exactly the same issues to deal with as a Kingfisher except a plc has one big disadvantage, it can be bought outright. I don't know about anybody else but I do make cuts to my costs every year, whether it be my energy costs, insurance costs, scam membership, banking etc etc. So as I cut my suppliers get less and also need to cut etc etc. This is necessary to keep me competitive and make sure I can generate a profit to keep Mrs P&S in the luxury she has become used to. If a Kingfisher has incurred a profits drop, then there will be a view as to whether it is run properly or not and ultimately the management can be replaced / or more worryingly it can be bought outright by a Carrefour for example. This is why business has to be supported and encouraged in the UK as its business that employs people and paying NI, pensions and CT and those employees pay tax, NI and spend money hence VAT.
Lefties kill this all stone dead, they should never be in power in a Global capitalist system, its a way too dangerous world for idealistic (wouldn't the world be great if)..... ideas that simply don't work. VOTE TORY its our only hope.

Global capitalist system....what bull. So every year while you are busy cutting costs do you cut your prices to suit ? If you do not then the only person seeing the benefit of your cuts is "self". Thank goodness less than a third of those who can be bothered to vote are not silly enough to be taken in by the tories.
As I said above if we are using a pure capitalist model then we should adhere to it completely. No taxpayer subsidizing, No bailouts NOTHING. If business want to use OUR public services like road,rail,police,education....you know that stuff that actually enables business to operate, Then they should dam well pay for it along with the rest of us not just take take take and then eventually bugger off out of the country because they have bled it dry.
I actually realize that all the dream left wing policies are unachievable but I do know if they were achieved we would ALL be better off including businesses. If the right wingers continue to get their way then within a generation we will all be reminiscing about the times it used to all be "free" but now it is too expensive.
Time to get rid of the Tory scum, Its our only hope !!!
 
CAVEAT*****

Source of information will be revealed later!


So everybody gets upset about the right to buy policy of the Conservative Government led by Margaret Thatcher of 1979 - but:

1. In what year was it first in a Party manifesto?
2. For which political party?

Have fun
 
This is why business has to be supported and encouraged in the UK as its business that employs people
So would you be happy if your son/daughter/wife was employed on an exploitative zero hours contract and was reliant on top ups from the benefit system to make ends meet?
It's supporting a business after all
 
So would you be happy if your son/daughter/wife was employed on an exploitative zero hours contract and was reliant on top ups from the benefit system to make ends meet?
It's supporting a business after all

Or if you are in Doncaster, subsidising your Council Tax
 
CAVEAT*****

Source of information will be revealed later!


So everybody gets upset about the right to buy policy of the Conservative Government led by Margaret Thatcher of 1979 - but:

1. In what year was it first in a Party manifesto?
2. For which political party?

Have fun

I think the ability to buy council houses was around for years, it was the Thatcher government made it a legal right. (I think)

Who gets upset though? It was 35 years ago. I disagree with it but I'm certainly not upset, although I can't speak for everyone.
Why are you upset Murdoch?
 
I think the ability to buy council houses was around for years, it was the Thatcher government made it a legal right. (I think)

Who gets upset though? It was 35 years ago. I disagree with it but I'm certainly not upset, although I can't speak for everyone.
Why are you upset Murdoch?
Because we will not agree with his extreme views, he slags everyone off, all parties, yet we know not what he believes in, every policy mentioned here he disagrees with, thats why he is angry lol. Joking aside I really like Clive, but his political views are very secret.
 
I think the ability to buy council houses was around for years, it was the Thatcher government made it a legal right. (I think)

Who gets upset though? It was 35 years ago. I disagree with it but I'm certainly not upset, although I can't speak for everyone.
Why are you upset Murdoch?


So come on and try and answer my Saturday quiz!
 
CAVEAT*****

Source of information will be revealed later!


So everybody gets upset about the right to buy policy of the Conservative Government led by Margaret Thatcher of 1979 - but:

1. In what year was it first in a Party manifesto?
2. For which political party?

Have fun
Thing is Clive she has sold off all the council houses and then it has left us with a houses shortage for those people who cannot afford to buy, we now need to build houses which are low cost to house people, whatever you may think it still gets back to Thatcher, she has single handedlly destroyed this country IMO, She IMO knew about the pending invasion on the Falklands yet due to her falling in the polls decided to wait until it was too late to gain more support from the public by sending in the task force, apart from the Falklands capture she did nothing for us, nothing, lets not forget the Miners situation and the Poll tax, lets not forget the demise of the industry, lets not forget the housing shortage due to selling off, I despise the woman.
 
Well, all you left leaning voters attack The Conservatives for what is actually a Labour policy. Go figure

How many policies are put on paper then abandoned by all the parties? Ukip seem to do it more often than I change socks.
 
well the Tories have broken 22 promises from the last election, that was at the last count, it could me more now, they think they are above the law, lets not forget pleb gate.
 
Well, all you left leaning voters attack The Conservatives for what is actually a Labour policy. Go figure

I think you need to do more than read a snippet on the web and then form an opinion.

The right to buy in the 1959 manifesto only applied to private tenants in sub standard accommodation, ie no bathroom, which Labour said that they would let councils take over to modernise as the private landlords had not. But there was a proviso that the existing tenant would have the right to buy first.
Hardly the same is it.

Now I never knew this but it took just a couple of minutes to find out.

Go figure.
 
Thing is Clive she has sold off all the council houses and then it has left us with a houses shortage for those people who cannot afford to buy, we now need to build houses which are low cost to house people, whatever you may think it still gets back to Thatcher, she has single handedlly destroyed this country IMO, She IMO knew about the pending invasion on the Falklands yet due to her falling in the polls decided to wait until it was too late to gain more support from the public by sending in the task force, apart from the Falklands capture she did nothing for us, nothing, lets not forget the Miners situation and the Poll tax, lets not forget the demise of the industry, lets not forget the housing shortage due to selling off, I despise the woman.

1.don't forget that when a family bought their council house, they were no longer tenants or prospective tenants. therefore, although there was 1 less house in the council stock, there was also 1 less family, so how come a shortage?

2. I don't agree or disagree about the falklands. with hindsight, more could have been done sooner asnd maybe avoided the conflict.

3. Miner's situation was caused by arthur scargill's attempt to bring down the government, no matter who suffered. that said, it could have been handled better.

4. poll tax. under the old rates system, my father was paying around £1,300/ year, living on his own, on a pension. a family close by in a lower band house were paying £250 between 4 wage earners. when the poll tax came in, my dad's bill went down to £250.
their's went up. bear in mind that it's people that use the facilities funded by council taxes, not houses. each house has 1 bin to be emptied, same road access, so why should a widowed pensioner pay more than 4 wage earners just because he's invested in a decent house, rather than spending all his wages on smokes, booze, gambling etc.
 
1.don't forget that when a family bought their council house, they were no longer tenants or prospective tenants. therefore, although there was 1 less house in the council stock, there was also 1 less family, so how come a shortage?

2. I don't agree or disagree about the falklands. with hindsight, more could have been done sooner asnd maybe avoided the conflict.

3. Miner's situation was caused by arthur scargill's attempt to bring down the government, no matter who suffered. that said, it could have been handled better.

4. poll tax. under the old rates system, my father was paying around £1,300/ year, living on his own, on a pension. a family close by in a lower band house were paying £250 between 4 wage earners. when the poll tax came in, my dad's bill went down to £250.
their's went up. bear in mind that it's people that use the facilities funded by council taxes, not houses. each house has 1 bin to be emptied, same road access, so why should a widowed pensioner pay more than 4 wage earners just because he's invested in a decent house, rather than spending all his wages on smokes, booze, gambling etc
.
Gasp, Gasp and double Gasp, surely and I am shaking with disbelief now terrance, your not, surely not, Gasp defending the ------Poll Tax????? Gasp
 
Gasp, Gasp and double Gasp, surely and I am shaking with disbelief now terrance, your not, surely not, Gasp defending the ------Poll Tax????? Gasp

Well if you wanted to find something good about the poll tax it's that its implementation was the downfall of Thatcher.
 
Easy chart for the election here
 

Attachments

  • tory chart.jpg
    tory chart.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 56
Gasp, Gasp and double Gasp, surely and I am shaking with disbelief now terrance, your not, surely not, Gasp defending the ------Poll Tax????? Gasp

the principal was fine. tax people for what people benefit from. it's the army of non-politival, overpaid civil servants tht escalated the cost. and it's terence btw, lol.

wish i was clever and could do flow charts. if i could, mine would look like this:

should i vote labour. ....... can i trust them with a kid's piggy bank, let alone the country's economy, ... NO. .... don't vote labour.
 
Last edited:
the principal was fine. tax people for what people benefit from. it's the army of non-politival, overpaid civil servants tht escalated the cost. and it's terence btw, lol.
Sorry pal, my mistake, I will blame the Cider on this occassion lol.
 
good to hear your back on decent booze. that creamflow poisoned your system. give it a year or 2 to get out of your system and you might even vote tory. :yes:
 
careful. i could report that as offensive and get you a 3 months ban. lol. :38:
 
careful. i could report that as offensive and get you a 3 months ban. lol. :38:
That is probably going to happen for the below reasons.

(1) I think for myself and I am not a sheep who follows others
(2) I would question any posts which gave bad advice
(3) I am true to myself and would not suck up to anyone who has authority
(4) I would trash anyone who uses racist language in their posts as I hate racism
(5) I would defend my friends here if they were banned for defending any of the 4 items listed above.
(6) I speak like a farmer and drink Cider yet I do not live in somerset
(7) I am overweight yet like to wear union jack shorts in the garden
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
Who will you vote for?
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrician Talk Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
389

Thread Tags

Tags Tags
None

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Guest77,
Last reply from
overskilled,
Replies
389
Views
33,807

Advert

Back
Top