Why dont we all........

[Deleted member 9648]

......just stop doing bloody certs. Following on from the current certs thread I'm sick to death of filling in reams and reams of poxy tick boxes and irrelevant information that no fecker apart from honest law abiding electricians ever look at. Eighty per cent of those in circulation are jackanory anyway.....at least those I come across are. If we all said f'kit we are doing them no more the world will keep on turning just the same.

I'm off to fill in a CU change EIC. I might make it up. I know I wont though. But then again...

 

[Dave OCD]

I know exactly what you mean mate, have to force myself to do them before leaving jobs or it could be a month before they happen.

 

[buzzlightyear]

when I finished any certs I tell the customer it will be in the post
from Santa claws from the north pole .

 

[westward10]

I love doing paperwork, 500 to 800 circuit EICRs heaven

 

[Octopus]

The current EIC is a joke with all the tick boxes ....

There should be a short form EIC for single circuit additions

The coding on about 50% of EICR's can't be trusted

And the scams should state that MWC's are NOT required for accessory changes .... my last assessment discussed this ........... I stated I recorded the Zs on the invoice for accessory changes - this approach wasn't challenged.

 

[Octopus]

I love doing paperwork, 500 to 800 circuit EICRs heaven

They must be like painting the 4th road bridge - as soon as you've finished, do you start again?

 

[westward10]

The schedule of inspection for both the EIC and EICR have one purpose, check lists for people who are not competent to undertake the task in the first place.

 

[westward10]

The schedule of inspection for both the EIC and EICR have one purpose, check lists for people who are not competent to undertake the task in the first place.

I really like doing them but we use our own format with the minimum required information on the schedules not two pages, one which is not required like the NICEIC format.

 

[Dannyg8810]

The current EIC is a joke with all the tick boxes ....

There should be a short form EIC for single circuit additions

The coding on about 50% of EICR's can't be trusted

And the scams should state that MWC's are NOT required for accessory changes .... my last assessment discussed this ........... I stated I recorded the Zs on the invoice for accessory changes - this approach wasn't challenged.

There is a single circuit installation cert mate

 

[Dannyg8810]

I really like doing them but we use our own format with the minimum required information on the schedules not two pages, one which is not required like the NICEIC format.

http://www.napitonline.com/downloads/NAPIT17thEdMinorWorks.pdf

 

[buzzlightyear]

didn't the IEE ask for some input about the new regs before they publish it.
yeah, stop writing more cr*p

 

[Dannyg8810]

Sorry meant to reply to murdoch westward

Spoke to NAPIT today and it's a legit cert just need to be with them to use this specific cert

 

[westward10]

Sorry meant to reply to murdoch westward

Spoke to NAPIT today and it's a legit cert just need to be with them to use this specific cert

I'm easily confused you know

 

[Leesparkykent]

I currently have 27 EIC's, 3 EICRs, 11 fire alarm Certs and 11 emergency lighting certs....all written in rough ready to type up

 

[westward10]

I currently have 27 EIC's, 3 EICRs, 11 fire alarm Certs and 11 emergency lighting certs....all written in rough ready to type up

Bliss