Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

I personally think a C1 is a bit extreme.
Is a c1 fair when there is mass amounts missing . I recon on this job it's the case of if its a C1 for 1 of the CUs then it's a C1 for them all locked location or not . Like previously said by other dont know who will access the local. .
 
Does this mean that if there is masses of grommets missing that should be a code 1 .. just asking out of curiosity .also does it make a diffrence if only 1 or 2 blanks are missing or is it just the rule of thumb that it's always a C1..
Gromits missing not quite the same as blanks. It depends if you can get your finger in the hole and it could touch live parts. Then it would be a C1.

If your concerned about ingress or protection of cables on entry then probably C3 maybe C2 depending on other factors.
 
I have to say that the code should be based on the scenario. C1 is immediately dangerous. So if in normal circumstances that panel cannot be accessed by anyone but a skilled person then it can be a C2.

My gut feeling on an EICR is if you have some blanks in your van that will fit then fit them and don't even record it as a code.
 
Generally I would a C1 in a general area and a C2 in a cupboard with controlled access. It does really depend on how that access is managed. At the larger station I work on electric cupboards and switch room keys are very tightly controlled.
 
Generally I would a C1 in a general area and a C2 in a cupboard with controlled access. It does really depend on how that access is managed. At the larger station I work on electric cupboards and switch room keys are very tightly controlled.
Why does the skilled person matter? You have potential exposed live parts.
 
Why discuss what code for having a blank missing:rolleyes:
There is no such specific problem as a missing blank and it is nigh on impossible to group each situation and set a universal code

The judgement should be made on accessibility to live parts without the use of a tool,if they can be accessed the code is different to non accessed (whether blanks exist or don't exist,they are in themselves irrelevant)
 
I personally think a C1 is a bit extreme.

Hit, nail and head spring to mind

C1 if at a low level and you can see the copper
C2 if at a high level and if you can see copper

BUT ifs it when doing an EICR, I would probably get one out of the van and fit it ............ unless the installation is a pile of poo!
 

Reply to Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
438
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
1K

Similar threads

  • Question
There is no homework, and I'll never see these photo again.
Replies
3
Views
623
As the cable itself has had the cpc cut off at both ends I would enter a C3 as it doesn't offer any protection within the cable if accidentally...
Replies
3
Views
348

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top