EICR - PLASTIC CONSUMER UNIT CODE C2 or C3

[johnduffell]

Not an optomistic ........... a straight disagree.

Someone has to think big, Steve Jobs didn't innovate by following the old rules!
Anyway I've given you a friendly because you explained it's your opinion

 

[johnduffell]

Or you could use the equivalent system already in place. Use your training and experience to make a judgement on site, take a photo to prove your findings, and digitally attach it to your report using your certification software.

True well that's the current system, in that post i was addressing the op issue as this whole thread seemed to have ended up about inconsistent opinions and how to get clarity on which is correct, what better way to get consistency than with a deterministic process.

 

[Octopus]

One day there will be a crystal ball app, and you'll just take a photo of everything then it will connect to the servers and print out a full inspection report for you. Then you just need to do the testing and there will be a fully standard eicr with no room for argument (waiting for the optimistic rating there!)

edited that for you

I think this has already been invented - loads of low cost EICR's are produced like this every day

 

[johnduffell]

I think this has already been invented - loads of low cost EICR's are produced like this every day

Except without the benefit of an app, just a blank sheet of paper and a bit of imagination!

 

[ipf]

My post is my personal opinion. I do not do EICR's so it doesn't affect anyone really. Just shocked to think that anyone would even consider giving a CU a C2 just because it's plastic.

I gave one a Code 1.....definitely!

Mind you...….there was a great big 3'' hole melted out the front of it.

 

[Baker1988]

Well this has been a very fun thread to read but here is my 2 cents on this.
I would personally not code a plastic consumer unit just for been plastic but i would code it a c3 of it was under wooden stairs with no fire protection or was in the only escape route.
A c3 does not say that its is dangerous and it still gets a satifactory but it brings to light that it could be improved which a metal one installed correctly would do.
And to those that are saying that the board was not dangerous when it was installed and was the norm yes it may be but pre 1966 the norm was to install lighting circuits with no cpc but that today is classed as dangerous and would probily get a c2 but back then it was fine. Times change and so do the regs.
Just to be clear im im not saying it dangerous at all but doesnt mean it cant be improved upon as the regs are only a minimum standard too so surely there is some room for improvement.

 

[johnduffell]

1966 the norm was to install lighting circuits with no cpc but that today is classed as dangerous and would probily get a c2 but back then it was fine

Would it really? If there are exposed conductive parts with no earth, certainly, but if everything is plastic then it wouldn't be any more dangerous than any other class II equipment.
Of course any more recent modifications would be c2 as they couldn't be added without RCD protection and cpc.

 

[Nigel]

What I fail to understand in this thread are those that say it is a C2 under stairs and a C3 elsewhere or a C3 understairs and a no code elsewhere.

The intent of the Reg is to limit the spread of fire if it should occur. When did we start putting gradings on electrical fires? So are thise that would code this way saying it is ok to have an electrical fire in a kitchen but not under the stairs?

Do the same people code a C2 if a cable is undersized under the stairs but only a C3 if the cables are in the lounge?

 

[DC-backfrom the past]

This is the type of problem I sometimes face .
A landlord will get an EICR with several faults thereon by local authority electrician.
Ive had several jobs "rectifying the EICR fault list"
on two occasions they have marked plastic consumer units under stairs as C2 .
When challenged they have agreed its not c2 solely because of location and being plastic. a supervisor has then stated it was an error and put it as c3.
I suspect that this is sometimes coded this way(by the council) to make sure the system is fully updated IE new consumer unit.

Also, I think sometimes people, through fear of being wrong and ending up in court, just code things .. more dangerous to cover their own back.
Whilst some seem to look at it as …"its like an mot "..only worth the paper it was written on ...on the day of testing. (hence the people doing it for very cheap prices).

I have enjoyed and learned a lot by challenging some of the EICR codes put down by the council electricians.
On occasions its been due to reading some of the posts and answers to problems on here and verifying via guidance notes etc.

The debates on here are good, helpful and thought provoking .sometimes funny
keep it up

 

[Baker1988]

Would it really? If there are exposed conductive parts with no earth, certainly, but if everything is plastic then it wouldn't be any more dangerous than any other class II equipment.
Of course any more recent modifications would be c2 as they couldn't be added without RCD protection and cpc.

Thats why I said "probably" as you say if all was class 2/plastic fittings then in the event of a fault it wouldn't be come dangerous so would not be a code 2 but would certainly be a code 3 still as improvement would be beneficial and as the regs say they needs to be a cpc at each point but at the time of installing it it was the way to do it but not now.

 

[Briggs69]

After your thoughts on EICR coding for an existing plastic consumer unit in an under stairs cupboard, firstly in a standard domestic dwelling and secondly in a house of multiple occupancy.
After discussing this others and with tech helplines seems to be a bit of a split as to what code!

If it’s in good condition no code at all.theres millions of insulated boards in the uk can’t change them all just cause there not amendment 3

 

[Toneyz]

JPEL /64 is stuffed full of manufacturers with profits to make ...

Like who? I agree with you if your right but need a more to go on than that.

 

[westward10]

Just something people keep whining on about.

 

[Octopus]

Like who? I agree with you if your right but need a more to go on than that.

Committee members

• 
  Nominating organizations
• & Surveying
• A E A - Agricultural Engineers Association
• A M D E A - Association of Manufacturers of Domestic Appliances
• Association of Manufacturers of Power Generating Systems
• B E A M A Installation Ltd
• B E A M A Limited
• B T Plc. - British Telecommunications Plc
• BEIS - Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
• British Approvals Service for Cables
• British Cables Association
• Certsure LLP
• Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers
• CIGRE - UK
• City & Guilds
• City and Guilds of London Institute
• DC Users Forum
• Deputy Chair
• E N A - Energy Networks Association
• E R A Technology Ltd
• EAL
• Electrical Contractors Association
• Electrical Safety First
• Energy Institute
• G A M B I C A Association Limited
• H S E - Health and Safety Executive
• Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning Manufactures Association
• I E T - Institution of Engineering and Technology
• Institute of Healthcare Engineering and Estate Management
• Institution of Lighting Professionals
• Intertek Group PLC
• Lighting Industry Association
• M o D - U K Defence Standardization
• MHCLG - Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government
• N A P I T - National Association of Professional Inspectors and Testers
• NHS Scotland
• Professional Lighting and Sound Association
• R I A - Railway Industry Association
• S E L E C T
• Safety Assessment Federation Ltd
• Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders Limited
• SPACES - Society for PUblic Architecture, Construction, Engineering
• Sub-Committee Member
• The Association of Manufacturers of Power generating Systems
• U N I T E - The Union
• United Kingdom Accreditation Service
  Liaisons with other committees
• Chair - CPW/4
• Chair - JEPL/64/B
• Chair - JPEL/64/A
• Chair - JPEL/64/C
• Individual Capacity - Surge Protection Devices
• Individual Capacity � Competent Persons Forum
• Liaison - FSH/12
• Liaison - GEL/8
• Liaison - GEL/82
• Liaison - TCT/7
• UK Expert - CLC/TC64/WG 4
  BSI roles
• B S I Contact for External Secretary
• Committee Chair
• External Secretary
• External Secretary/Administrator

 

[westward10]

I cannot see any manufacturers on there.