EU Brexit - How will you vote given the latest "news"

[Midwest]

Think Cameron has made it clear, there will be no second referendum?

 

[Darkwood]

Can't say that I agree DW. With or without Farage's comment, a small majority for out would be met with a call for another referendum fro Cameron.

Exactly my point but as Cameron has publically stated as an attack on Farages comment that a small majority win for IN would not see another referendum vote then he can't be seen to do this if the tables were turned to a narrow win for brexit... my whole point was it was a stategic comment to get a response and if so it worked a treat.

 

[andyb]

Exactly my point but as Cameron has publically stated as an attack on Farages comment that a small majority win for IN would not see another referendum vote then he can't be seen to do this if the tables were turned to a narrow win for brexit... my whole point was it was a stategic comment to get a response and if so it worked a treat.

I did get your point DW. My point was that he's a politician, I don't think he'll have a problem with going back on his word.

 

[Midwest]

Exactly my point but as Cameron has publically stated as an attack on Farages comment that a small majority win for IN would not see another referendum vote then he can't be seen to do this if the tables were turned to a narrow win for brexit... my whole point was it was a stategic comment to get a response and if so it worked a treat.

To be fair Cameron has been saying only there will be only one referendum, for some time, as far as I've read?

 

[Darkwood]

To be fair Cameron has been saying only there will be only one referendum, for some time, as far as I've read?

Agree but I think you take that out of the context it was said, when he has said that before he is refering to a referendum down the line for which ever way this vote goes, he has stated if it all goes pete tong then we cannot hold another referendum to reverse the situation, as I recall he was using it as a scare tactic saying if we vote to leave then that is it for good, we cannot have another referendum in several years to rejoin.

 

[Midwest]

I think it says, whatever the Great British Public vote, than that's wots gonna happen. You can't change your mind retrospectively 'cos in a few years time say 'we made the wrong decision' lets change it. If we OUT we ain't getting back IN. If we're IN, we can't keep having this debate about being IN. Whatever the decision, lets just stick to it, I think that's wot people need to entertain, otherwise there's no point in having a referendum, something Sturgeon should get into her head.

 

[Darkwood]

I think its a real shame just for a lesson to sturgeon that they didn't get independence, after the oil prices bottomed out after the vote it would have seen Scotland in a very bad position as she gambled the Scottish economy on the then price of oil with only a little buffer and not a massive collapse in barrel prices that occured, it a question she always avoids directly answering what put to her.

 

[Adam W]

I was referring to post 413 in my comment Adam, not your previous post re Brown.

What? I wrote post #413. What is it you want clarification on Andy, or do you just want to challenge everything I post?

 

[andyb]

What? I wrote post #413. What is it you want clarification on Andy, or do you just want to challenge everything I post?

I think you've misunderstood me Adam, I've not really challenged anything you've said.
I know you wrote post 413, I never attributed the line re ''anyone who is against immigration is a "racist" and/or a "bigot" to you. I know that you were suggesting that Tony Blair introduced the notion. My reply was with that in mind.
Anyway, I'm sorry for giving you the impression that I was just challenging you for the sake of it.

 

[Octopus]

I did get your point DW. My point was that he's a politician, I don't think he'll have a problem with going back on his word.

Hum....... do you believe ANY politician these days? I sure don't

 

[jackhammerJIM]

To start with i believed the horror stories that leaving would destroy our trading ability in Europe and plunge us back into recession .
Having looked into it more there are plenty of countries trading in and with Europe who are not members of the union so i say rubbish to it lets leave .

The EU reminds me of Sepp Blatter and FIFA an absolute corrupt shambles

 

[Darkwood]

The issue with been in the EU is any member has limitation slapped on them as to who and how much they can trade outside the EU - WHY! This is to ringfence and protect the EU's markets and industries at the cost of members trade growth with the rest of the world also the consequence is it also stop external competition with a knock on effect of us paying higher prices for lower quality goods in some industries. If we leave, and the EU knows this, it would give us access to a larger consumer choice and the EU fears the competition would see our preferences for better quality, cheaper goods thus they loose some of our vital trade to there cost.

 

[Octopus]

Did you know that MEP's can't suggest new laws? Its all driven by the unelected commissioners.

Not very democratic, me thinks!

 

[Darkwood]

Did you know that MEP's can't suggest new laws? Its all driven by the unelected commissioners.

Not very democratic, me thinks!

The can suggest but it would be futile unless it was already on the EU's shopping list. :shame:

 

[telectrix]

1 million UK jobs have been taken by EU migrants in the last 5 years. UK economic growth has been held back by EU red tape, inefficiency and corruption. now is the timw to get out once and for all. if the vote is to remain, then we're fooked forever.