Oh I agree with those reg's but I still wouldn't bring it up in a court. Grommets are only doing a job during installation, once the walls are plastered, you have an insulated and sheathed cable held in place.
Unless there is visible sheath damage, would you code a missing grommet on a PIR?
see your point, but the number of times i've seen the plaster disintegrate, the cable pressed back against the entry hole by plaster....... and what if it's dry lined? the cable is usually loose behind the board
i cant see that standing up in court tbh bs7671 regs are non-statutory, if he wasn,t registered you would stand a good chance and if the jobs not finished who was to say he didnt intend to fit them ? i really wish it was that easy to stop cowboys doin bad work, but what do these proven idiots on rogue traders etc get ? nothing they seem to walk clean all the time hence y we now have to fight to get work and settle for a wage you could match workin in tescos with no qualifications!
Not quite correct. Okay if you have a bit of leeway but you have to take into account the PF. The power factor of a system affects the cable size as this dictates the Kvars wasted in effectively heating wires for no useful work. A generating system will run at somewhere between .4PF and 0.85PF depending on how well it is manufactured, the given load and the actual demand on it. If we take a good PF of 0.8 then even with this PF which in a domestic situation would be hard to achieve, the actual amperage load on a 4.3KW system would be around 22A, not 18.7. That's why you have to use cable for a load that you do not see - Kvars provide no work but heat wire and the wire size must be sized accordingly. Of course if you aren't going to get to 4.3Kw then no big deal.
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc