Payment Companies

[Alex2012]

Used Fairgate payment company 6 weeks ago never a problem, started different job, got my text saying i was going to get paid Thursday, checked bank account that evening I had not been paid. Has anyone else had this problem.

Thanks Alex2012

 

[Andy 7671]

Only with Connor Williams 5 or 6 years ago. Most are pretty good.

I detest paying over a grand a year to get paid, and Im sitting here now doing my own accounts.

 

[flyingsausage]

I have had the same problem in getting a text only for nothing to be in the bank.
Fairgate is one of the better ones.

If you are not CIS some of them want to take holiday pay off you.As well as VAT recepts for petrol etc - they then claim the VAT back for themselves.

I was offered an agency job last year ang you had to use a certain payroll company,they worked it out for me that by the time they took their fee and holiday pay from my wages and all reciepts had to be VAT ones it was not worth taking the job and signing off the dole.

 

[Marvo]

I'm not sure exactly what they do but why would you use a payment company instead of getting paid directly?

 

[RISElectrical]

For long contracts when sub contracting you shouldn't be working for the same company on a full time basis, more than 3 months (last time I checked) therefore payment companies basically act as an agency/middle man so that the employer doesn't have to take you on cards in. Or at least that's my understanding of it in its simplest form.

 

[flyingsausage]

The agencies offer you no choice but to go through a payment company so you are not on their books.
You are working for them through a third party and are classed as self employed.This is what is reffered to as 'bogus self employment'.
Most agencies have an agreement with a payment company where they get a kick back from the payroll company for every spark they force to use them.
You then have to pay for the service of the payroll company with a fee taken out off your wages.

My post above where I was saying it was not worth me working was for a two week job I was offered last year.
The rate was £12 an hour and you had to pay a payroll company £30 to process your wages,they also took holiday pay from your wages as well at the rate of three and a half hours a week.
For claiming for petrol they were wanting a petrol VAT reciept and not every garage gives you them.
On the payroll companies form you could clearly see that they claimed all the VAT back on petrol/tools etc and kept this money to for themselves.
I was unemployed at the time and needed money into the bank quickly but when I added up my fee and taking holiday pay from me then the cost of petrol at £15 a day and the dole money I would lose ot was not worth taking.
You have to take into account the firt three days of dole money you lose when you are making a new claim.

I did offer to the agency to work for them direct through PAYE but they were not interested.
This is what we are fighting to end - we want rid of the agencies from our trade.
If you are a CIS spark I can see the attraction of agency work and paying less tax and getting a tax rebate every year.
But I do not see why I should have to be forced to work as self employed.
It would be different if you were paid the extra on the rate that you should get get if you are agency but now they seem to like paying way under the rate.

 

[Andy 7671]

£3o!!!!! to calculate 20%, a sum most people could do on their heads. Parasites. No certified accounts, different agencies force you to use different companies.

 

[UNG]

For claiming for petrol they were wanting a petrol VAT reciept and not every garage gives you them.

If you are charged VAT then they must by law issue a VAT invoice / receipt if or when requested

Had this problem with a very large company who would not issue a VAT invoice for goods I had purchased having contacted the VAT office the threat of a full and very detailed VAT inspection soon resolved the problem after I quoted the sections, sub sections and paragraphs of the VAT documents and mentioned that the VAT office had given me the information and would investigate if the invoice was not forthcoming

 

[Marvo]

The agencies offer you no choice but to go through a payment company so you are not on their books.
You are working for them through a third party and are classed as self employed.This is what is reffered to as 'bogus self employment'.
Most agencies have an agreement with a payment company where they get a kick back from the payroll company for every spark they force to use them.
You then have to pay for the service of the payroll company with a fee taken out off your wages......

Thanks for the explanation but I'm still a little confused.

Surely the scenario you describe would mean you're actually employed by the payment company?? What's the difference between the payment company and a labour broker or agency....apart from obviously the name??

 

[GLENNSPARK]

so you are forced into going through a payroll company....that then kicks back some of the money they stole....yes thats stole from you.....i`d tell it to get ****ed...

 

[VoltzElectrical]

Thanks for the explanation but I'm still a little confused.

Surely the scenario you describe would mean you're actually employed by the payment company?? What's the difference between the payment company and a labour broker or agency....apart from obviously the name??

they ask you some questions that your answers essentially mean that you are self employed under the IR 35 regulations.

I would love to see this shady practise stop. But how to do it? When you look at how the whole scenario regarding de-skilling of the trade etc.. is going, it doesn't bode well for the outcome of trying to get this stopped.

It's all very well to say 'oh well I don't want the job then', but when you are faced with the prospect of either sitting at home earning nothing, or taking a job through an agency operating this scheme, then you take the job, then bend over and take one from 'The Man'.

Really, the only hope we have is for this battle to be taken up by HMRC in the name of tax avoidance, or more specifically, NI avoidance, as those are the contributions being avoided by the agencies using this scheme.

 

[flyingsausage]

so you are forced into going through a payroll company....that then kicks back some of the money they stole....yes thats stole from you.....i`d tell it to get ****ed...

You are quite right in what you are saying - I think the use of these payment companies is legal fraud.
In this forum I have read about sparks who have highlighted this problem to Union Reps and MP's but it all seems to fall on death ears.

What has happened in many cases is that whoever owns the agency also owns the payroll company - I am sure you can smell the corruption.
Most agencies now insist on this - no payroll company no job.
I worked for Search a few years ago and it was a case of use payroll company or not work.
Another agency I worked with a while ago - Randstad forced me to go through one as well.If I wanted to work PAYE they would take £2 an hour of my rate under the guise that they had to pay me holiday pay(lies).

I have suffered when they have mucked up my wages and charged me twice the next week,once for the current weeks wages and once for the wages I was short the week before.(£50 of a very poor wage in the first place)

Even if you are a CIS spark you still have to use one of these payroll companies to get paid.

 

[flyingsausage]

I'm not sure exactly what they do but why would you use a payment company instead of getting paid directly?

For most agencies it is either work through a payment company or you don't work for them at all.

 

[flyingsausage]

Thanks for the explanation but I'm still a little confused.

Surely the scenario you describe would mean you're actually employed by the payment company?? What's the difference between the payment company and a labour broker or agency....apart from obviously the name??

This is all set up so that you are not actually working for the agency, you are working for the agency through a payment company(umbrella company).
Each payment company will send you out a contract and if you read it you will see that you are classed as selfemployed and have no employment rights because of this.This is how the client or agency can pump you at a moments notice with no right of a come back from you.

If you work for agencies all year you could end up using seven or eight different payment companies.

 

[flyingsausage]

they ask you some questions that your answers essentially mean that you are self employed under the IR 35 regulations.

I would love to see this shady practise stop. But how to do it? When you look at how the whole scenario regarding de-skilling of the trade etc.. is going, it doesn't bode well for the outcome of trying to get this stopped.

It's all very well to say 'oh well I don't want the job then', but when you are faced with the prospect of either sitting at home earning nothing, or taking a job through an agency operating this scheme, then you take the job, then bend over and take one from 'The Man'.

Really, the only hope we have is for this battle to be taken up by HMRC in the name of tax avoidance, or more specifically, NI avoidance, as those are the contributions being avoided by the agencies using this scheme.

There must be tens of billions of pounds lost in tax every year because of this National Insurance advoidance.