Discuss SPD in commercial offices in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
An SPD will not fully stop a surge, it steps it down to a more manageable level.I thought if you covered the incommer the rest is just optional.
Had one customer, of a previous employer, who would call us out at least once a year to replace a faulty rectifier module on one of their sites just north of Carlisle. After the third incident I decided to do a little research and the site alarm would trigger a rectifier fail everytime there was an electrical storm in the area.The combined industry experience of this forum probably runs to many hundreds if not thousands of years so the question is how many jobs have members been to where SPD's may have or would have prevented equipment damage and then would the cost of installing SPD's v's the replacement / repair cost of the equipment and disruption caused made it a cost effective decision to install SPD's
To some extent this is how I see it. These days many domestic CU have them already fitted, or they are around £50 more, so on a board change it is typically under 10% of the cost and could well save that in years to come.When you look at the cost of an SPD I suppose it could be classed as an insurance policy that could sit there for many years and may never ever be needed so how do you justify the cost to the customer.
I think the change is now we are seeing far more easily damaged stuff being used in homes. LED lighting, an array of expensive electronics goods, and most white-goods are now controlled by complex solid-state systems. Also they are getting cheaper and nastier by design as they get "value engineered" to save a couple of pence here and there.Personally in all the years I have worked in the industry I have only seen less than a handful of incidents that may have benefited from an SPD being installed so why is the push now to suggest that sites are at a much greater risk
Indeed! This should be the FIRST point when looking to install!I've seen a lot of surge arrestors fitted on intruder alarm comms kit where the installer didn't bother to connect them to a suitable earth so it made them a bit useless
I've worked on a number of sites with rooftop comms kit and while installing comms kit I got into the habit of doing a quick test on the LPS down lead
At 12 mins John Ward explains why these day SPD is important. Dave Savery on one of his vids fitted SDP under an assumption spikes were causing expensive LED lamps to fail too frequently. It was fitted then no problems. How many expensive pcb boards in boilers would have been saved if SDP was fitted? Not to ention being cold and no hot water. mmmm Expensive components may have failed, yet we do we attribute the failure to a spike!Having seen a hospital take a substantial lightning strike with a repair bill of circa £500,000 and about 4 - 5 days disruption there was a full risk assessment done on the future risk of it happening again the results of which concluded that the cost (around £600,000) of installing the necessary protection across the site versus the strike risk was not a viable spend having had no documented strikes in the previous 40 - 50 years and a calculated future strike risk of 1 sometime in the next 44 to 400 years
Sounds like the NIC trying to make a point and help the manufacturers sell more, I'm surprised the NIC are not insisting on professional indemnity for contractors in case they fit the wrong type of SPD
Anyone for efficacy insurance if the SPD fails to operate under surge / strike conditions
I've seen a lot of surge arrestors fitted on intruder alarm comms kit where the installer didn't bother to connect them to a suitable earth so it made them a bit useless
I've worked on a number of sites with rooftop comms kit and while installing comms kit I got into the habit of doing a quick test on the LPS down lead after we had some interference problems on one site where all the comms cables going to a number of buildings were earthing the LPS at the indoor units because the LPS down lead connection to the earth rod was broken and this was on an LPS that had been tested and certified some 10 months earlier the customer was adamant that it was ok and waved the certificate at me so I got a spade out and exposed the corroded LPS earth connections and then had to more or less drag him out of his office across the site to show him the problem that we had found
Based on what risk assessment and likely hood of it actually happening
When you look at the cost of an SPD I suppose it could be classed as an insurance policy that could sit there for many years and may never ever be needed so how do you justify the cost to the customer. As installations are altered and modified should the risk assessment be revisited to confirm that the type of SPD's installed are suitable for what may be a changed risk within the installation or whether the changes mean an SPD should be installed, which is something that no doubt will be addressed in future guidance
The combined industry experience of this forum probably runs to many hundreds if not thousands of years so the question is how many jobs have members been to where SPD's may have or would have prevented equipment damage and then would the cost of installing SPD's v's the replacement / repair cost of the equipment and disruption caused made it a cost effective decision to install SPD's
Personally in all the years I have worked in the industry I have only seen less than a handful of incidents that may have benefited from an SPD being installed so why is the push now to suggest that sites are at a much greater risk
Having seen a hospital take a substantial lightning strike with a repair bill of circa £500,000 and about 4 - 5 days disruption there was a full risk assessment done on the future risk of it happening again the results of which concluded that the cost (around £600,000) of installing the necessary protection across the site versus the strike risk was not a viable spend having had no documented strikes in the previous 40 - 50 years and a calculated future strike risk of 1 sometime in the next 44 to 400 years
Between 1942 and 1977, Sullivan was hit by lightning on seven occasions and survived all of them.Having seen a hospital take a substantial lightning strike with a repair bill of circa £500,000 and about 4 - 5 days disruption there was a full risk assessment done on the future risk of it happening again the results of which concluded that the cost (around £600,000) of installing the necessary protection across the site versus the strike risk was not a viable spend having had no documented strikes in the previous 40 - 50 years and a calculated future strike risk of 1 sometime in the next 44 to 400 years
A really scientific approach to solve a problem then, so lamps failed then they didn't after the SPD was fitted so could it have been..............................a bad batch of lamps!At 12 mins John Ward explains why these day SPD is important. Dave Savery on one of his vids fitted SDP under an assumption spikes were causing expensive LED lamps to fail too frequently. It was fitted then no problems.
Most of the failed boiler PCB's I've seen are down to crap soldering during manufacture causing high resistance joints that overheat and burn the boardHow many expensive pcb boards in boilers would have been saved if SDP was fitted? Not to ention being cold and no hot water. mmmm Expensive components may have failed, yet we do we attribute the failure to a spike!
Did he have an SPD fitted??Between 1942 and 1977, Sullivan was hit by lightning on seven occasions and survived all of them.
Roy Sullivan - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
That approach worked. I am not sure if he said he contacted the local weather people to see if there were many lightning strikes about.A really scientific approach to solve a problem then, so lamps failed then they didn't after the SPD was fitted so could it have been..............................a bad batch of lamps!
Reply to SPD in commercial offices in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.