Wagos on Final Ring Circuits | Page 4 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Wagos on Final Ring Circuits in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Quite different indeed. In one, the cables are clamped by screw pressure against a piece of brass of negligible resistance, whereas in the other, they are clamped by screw pressure against a piece of brass of negligible resistance.

Having finished work now, I'm off home. Kat is still away visiting her family so I am going to have a mixed grill. I'll fry a couple of Wagos in case I need to spur off the onion rings, although there isn't mushroom in the back box.

TTFN
is that mixed grill a mixture of lever wagos and push-in wagos. ? bearing in mind that you need the lever type for the (flexible) onion rings.
 
Quite different indeed. In one, the cables are clamped by screw pressure against a piece of brass of negligible resistance, whereas in the other, they are clamped by screw pressure against a piece of brass of negligible resistance.

Having finished work now, I'm off home. Kat is still away visiting her family so I am going to have a mixed grill. I'll fry a couple of Wagos in case I need to spur off the onion rings, although there isn't mushroom in the back box.

TTFN
?
 
As an Amazon Associate Electricians Forums may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.
I don't think this is quite what you meant to say. Either that, or you will have to haggle with Mr Ohm and get him to change his ideas about proportionality between V and I in metallic conductors.
Your right of course, I think I lost the plot frustrated by the other issue. Current will flow according to the rules for parallel conductors and of course at the point of load the resistance of one path will be different to the other.
I think that's everything washed up now....oh sorry there's the mixed grill stuff ?
 
As an Amazon Associate Electricians Forums may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.
This one shows dishwasher, washing machine and tumble drier. Hardly distributing the heavy loads around the ring! About the full 32A from this one point from just those three.
 
This one shows dishwasher, washing machine and tumble drier. Hardly distributing the heavy loads around the ring! About the full 32A from this one point from just those three.
Yep. On my ring, which has 16 sockets off it - 12 double, four single. The kitchen is not far from the CU. When the toaster is on, 75% of its load is through one leg of the ring. So, when the full 32A is being drawn, if all the draw is in the kitchen bunched up, 24 amps will be through one leg. This is within the 27 amps of the 2.5 cable.

All my heavy appliances are on their own individual circuits. I was going to fit two radials, but it was cheaper using one lightly used ring.

A friend has a ring doing only his kitchen. The legs are pretty equal to the bunched appliances. The distribution is ~equal on both legs.
 
Last edited:
Isn't this going to end up as multiple spurs from the same point on a ring when fitted?

Not if it's fed by a 4.0mm² radial. I wouldn't put that assembly on a general-purpose ring out of choice.
 
Not if it's fed by a 4.0mm² radial. I wouldn't put that assembly on a general-purpose ring out of choice.
i wouldn'tput it on anything other than a skip. the number of fail ed switches i've encountered on those appliance grids is phenomenal. seen loads bridged due to this.
 
They look like grid switches.
they are grid switches. generally specced by costomers who don't want FCUs or D/P switches along the worktops. then they moan when the dishwasher/freezer/washing machine wuuna work coz the switch is broke.
 
they are grid switches. generally specced by costomers who don't want FCUs or D/P switches along the worktops. then they moan when the dishwasher/freezer/washing machine wuuna work coz the switch is broke.
You can make up grid switches cheaper. My experience with grid switches, is only buy the branded quality ranges. Frustrating and time consuming when fitting with so many wires in tight locations. Some carrying high loads as well, which is off putting. They are convenient and neat looking for the users though.

I don't have FCus along worktops. There is no need for them if sockets are in adjacent cupboards to appliances in easy to reach locations. Unnecessary.

Bunching off hravy load appliances on rings is ultra common. Only diversity keeps it safe.
 

Reply to Wagos on Final Ring Circuits in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
435
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
937
  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
892

Similar threads

I thought I'd add a few photo's of the overall situation we find ourselves in and the general standard of the building work, which is why going...
Replies
9
Views
388
Often, but not always: 543.2.9 Except where the circuit protective conductor is formed by a metal covering or enclosure containing all of the...
2
Replies
23
Views
887

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top