Would you accept a Ze of 199Ω on a TT Installation which also has an RCD. | Page 2 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Would you accept a Ze of 199Ω on a TT Installation which also has an RCD. in the Talk Electrician area at ElectriciansForums.net

Would you accept a Ze of 199Ω on a TT Installation which also has an RCD?

  • Yes

    Votes: 6 27.3%
  • No

    Votes: 16 72.7%

  • Total voters
    22
A meaningless poll without a 'depends' option.

I've accepted far higher, I've also refused to accept far lower.

Including the depends option, would be interested to know your reasoning behind acceptance vs refusal.
Its the one area where over the years I have never seen agreement on what determines a stable value.
At what point does one say yay or nay ?
 
How many electrodes and how deep do they go? A higher Ra value from multiple 8' rods properly spaced will be far more stable than a lower value on a single 4' long rod
 
Including the depends option, would be interested to know your reasoning behind acceptance vs refusal.
Its the one area where over the years I have never seen agreement on what determines a stable value.
At what point does one say yay or nay ?

That's the point there is no set stable value. The only way to determine stability is to test the TT system during different seasons of the year (eg wet and dry seasons) If there is a significant difference in Ra values between the two, then it's not stable. Generally you will achieve a good deal of stability from the depth the electrodes are driven, in decent soil conditions, and why i always advise a minimum of two extendable 5/8'' rods. You'll never in a month of Sunday's ever achieve a stable TT Ra value using a 1.2m thin twig.


You can however quite reasonably have a stable 200, 300, ....500 ohm electrode, which again makes the statement in BS7671 that many still use as a max Ra value, not worth the paper it's written on!!
 
The relevance was often a sore point back in the days when we were completing installations for petrol filling stations.
We worked at the time to the old HS G 41.
I believe BS/EN 60079 is the current standard alongside 3871.
We worked towards a value of sub 20 ohms for TT
Rod or earth plates being employed.
Often the general mass of steel work and even the tanks themselves would bring the values well down once main, and cross bonding were in place.
Now that's when the bonding regime of the 15th really came into its own.
The risks of diverted neutral currents left PME on the shelf.
Guaranteed TN-S was also used, but what was meant by guaranteed was any ones guess.
Always seemed a joke to see all the bonding, cross bonding, earthing arrangements, and precautions taken by the tanker drivers when hooking up.
And then along comes a young lad on his moped, straight into the hazardous zone, with a nice fat couple of thousand volt spark jumping across his dodgy HT lead.
 
DNO substations also work to a 20 ohm value, but very few will be anything like 20 ohm, most will indeed be sub 1 ohm, but then again, i've never seen 1.2 metre earth rods being used at any substation they would generally be 5/8'' or 3/4'' extendable 2.4 or 3.2 metre examples and will often be dropped into drilled bore holes surrounded by Bentonite or Marconite. Earth plates are fine the biggest drawbacks to their use is that the ground needs to be excavated first Which generally means that they are often not installed to any great depth, and you can't reliably test them until they have been backfilled and compacted. Same goes for copper tape grids, both systems being far more expensive to implement than installing ground rod electrodes...

Interconnecting different earthing systems say Ufer, underground metal tanks, and made electrodes also needs some thought put into it, as spheres of influence can overlap that can have detrimental effects to the overall Ra values, it's not just an easy case of connecting everything together and hoping for the best...

The bulk fuel tankers connect to storage tanks at filling stations and bulk storage facilities is a precautionary measure to reduce/eliminate any static electricity on the connecting pipework between carriers and static tanks that volatile fuel will be passing through.... I thought it was common practice NOT to fill vehicles at filling stations with the engine still running, i know it used to be....
 
...I've been in countless filling stations,where people are using their mobile devices,and engines are left running.

The most i have ever heard the staff say,is "Points card,sir?"....:conehead:
 
...I've been in countless filling stations,where people are using their mobile devices,and engines are left running.

The most i have ever heard the staff say,is "Points card,sir?"....:conehead:
don't really think it's an issue though, not heard of any petrol stations blowing up in the UK.
 
I was in Thame service station last year filling up and the tanker was there unloading at the same time . The next thing I know is the driver running across the forecourt after a skip waggon playing bloody hell !?

The skip waggon did not stop , and as the tanker driver was walking back past me he noticed that I was a little bemused , it turned out that the skip waggon driver had just filled up on a self service pump probably whilst still smoking because as he had reversed out to go off ( he had been in a car place and not a dedicated lorry one ) , he had flipped his tab out of the window at the feet of the tanker driver whilst he was still unloading !!!!
The old boy was still raging and said that it was a criminal offence and that he was going to get the video evidence and take it further .
 
don't really think it's an issue though, not heard of any petrol stations blowing up in the UK.

Nor i, it was always a precautionary rule that was generally adhered to in the day's when the petrol station attendants used to fill your car/bike etc at filling stations.... I imagine it's now ALL self service at filling stations in the UK... Not so in Cyprus, all are still attendant service from around 7am up until around 7-8pm then goes over to self service...

You need to see some of the filling stations i've seen in the Middle East and Asia, death traps just waiting to happen, you want to get in and out of there as quick as humanly possible!! And Yes i've seen a few of these establishments go up over the years, not at the time mind you, just seen the results of the aftermath!! lol!!
 
Think it's more of an issue at chemical plant off loading points with liquids such as vinyl acetate not diesel/petrol with different ignition points
 
Think it's more of an issue at chemical plant off loading points with liquids such as vinyl acetate not diesel/petrol with different ignition points

Nope, it's a very real issue at fuel storage depots, it'll be a tin tack job for a driver filling up a bulk storage carrier without first equalising his tanker to the depots equipotential zones pipework. I dare say the same would be the case at filling stations. Many people think that diesel tanks aren't that dangerous, but forget that highly volatile diesel fumes found at the top of all diesel tanks can be just as dangerous as petroleum as far as ignition points/values are concerned...
 
Nope, it's a very real issue at fuel storage depots, it'll be a tin tack job for a driver filling up a bulk storage carrier without first equalising his tanker to the depots equipotential zones pipework. I dare say the same would be the case at filling stations. Many people think that diesel tanks aren't that dangerous, but forget that highly volatile diesel fumes found at the top of all diesel tanks can be just as dangerous as petroleum as far as ignition points/values are concerned...
yes it's obviously an issue at storage depots, but i meant more the issue of phone use at filling stations compared to chemical plant off loading points.
at some off loading areas your not allowed to walk through with a battery powered pocket calculator!!
 
well in theory these do have the joule/watt energy to ignite some types of flammable vapours. And you don't want to be around when a 100M3 vessel goes up.This has happened in the past, a few been in the US, but there was one explosion in the north of England can't remember the sites name at the moment.
Flixborough in 74
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another myth is the one surrounding risks relating to mobile phone use on a petrol forecourt.
I asked the question twice, once when a Gilbarco engineer was on his mobile, and the second was weights and measures.
Both were of the same opinion.
There is no evidence to support the use of a mobile poses any danger ??
Not saying they are right, but I have never found anything that would say they are wrong ???
 
Doesn't really matter if actually using the phone or not - if it's switched on in your pocket then it's still polling the nearest bases station and gauging signal strength/tx power etc. And like people have said above, how many explosions has it caused. In fact, I think it was Brainiacs or Mythbusters which tested this theory out by ringing a load of mobile phones in a gas filled caravan. Must have been Brainiacs thinking about it! Daz
 
As silly as it sounds it has been taken in to account. Many chemical plants and gas facilites do have a police presence, as is in the Grimsby area.

The east Yorkshire coast one near Holmpton/Withernsea has armed police patrols in the area. Can't remember the name of it. Daz
 
Nice area around there. Nice bit of military history at Kilnsea and Spurn point. Daz
 
Don't start giving these ISIS Jihad types any ideas for fooks sake!!!

Remember when working at a nuclear power station just after 911.
Security was tighter than the proverbial ducks bottom.
We needed to change a supply source during a re furb.
UPS system for comms was signed off as being healthy, and we were give permission to shut down, lock off and transfer.
We were there as a contractor, and the in house maintenance sparks were also present.
All good to go says the in house sparky's with a thumbs up.
No problem bud, says I.
As soon as you throw the switch we will start the transfer.
Oh !! right ok he says.
Ker clunk,
Should of had a full half hour, system went down in less than five minutes.
Now back then if comms go down, all hell breaks loose.
The UPS service engineers were for the high jump, and when they asked who had isolated the supply I was able to say "I know nothing senor"
Moral of the story.
Don't be the scape goat for somebody else's responsibility.:ack2:
 

Reply to Would you accept a Ze of 199Ω on a TT Installation which also has an RCD. in the Talk Electrician area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
much more information required. Is the supply to the first building a DNO supply or a sub main cable from another building ? if it is a sub main...
Replies
5
Views
834
  • Question
It is a TNS system, the earth rod is providing an earth reference to make on epile of the supply neutral and is not part of the earth fault loop...
Replies
20
Views
5K
davesparks
D
Welcome to the forum. It's worth keeping an eye on thread dates btw! If you want, say hi and a bit about yourself here...
Replies
15
Views
4K
Hi, My probe was on the outgoing neutral of the RCBO. I will be testing again this week so I will play around, many thanks for your reply.
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Question
Yes, certainly my view on the matter as well! The TN-C-S option would not be so bad if it were a ring circuit (so no single PEN break causing...
2
Replies
29
Views
5K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks