O
Outspoken
I guess as a dramatically failing apprentice my opinion doesnt count for much but Personally I think it's a lot easier to have neutrals at the switch, simply because second fixing a switch with a few cables at it is easier than second fixing most ceiling roses etc.
I also think its slightly safer for the DIYer who when changing a light only have 3 wires to put in the correct place, as opposed to loops, neutrals switch wires and earths. And then when they swap a switch its alot simpler for them to understand.
i had this debate with an old college tutor who said I shouldn't feed switches this way as its not good practice.
YB, just because your an apprentice does not mean you do not have a valid point to make, however I must point out that your lack of experience and thus understanding of the dangers shows through in your comments.
As KAS1 has said, you put neutrals in switches and you will have idiots switching them, OK if double pole, but not single pole. Whether we like it or not we have to regulate and work to take into the most stupid in society. Just because we, as sparks, would never dream of switching a neutral without a DP switch, or of using the neutral as in my example above is not the reason to simply allow this practice to continue.
The regulations are there not for the safety of the installer, but of the installation and end user, we have to assume the end user is a knob who has read the "Which Book of Home Electrics" and attended the B&Q 1/2 day lesson in home rewiring and thinks he knows what he is doing. The old saying of "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" is 100% true in this instance.