Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios | Page 7 | on ElectriciansForums

Discuss Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

I would 99.9% of the time code a missing blank as C1 and I rarely give C1's.

It's a great big hole with a big piece of live copper behind it which is easily touchable!
 
What would you consider a C1?
I think the Code definitions are poorly defined. Code 1 Danger present, what does that actually actually represent. Code 2 Potentially dangerous is clear that there is potential for an incident. An mcb blank missing offers a potential to danger.
So what is Danger present?
 
I think the Code definitions are poorly defined. Code 1 Danger present, what does that actually actually represent. Code 2 Potentially dangerous is clear that there is potential for an incident. An mcb blank missing offers a potential to danger.
So what is Danger present?

Answer my question first.
 
Not read the whole thread. I will C1 missing blanks as if a Lighting circuit trips out people could be putting there hands though that hole in the dark.

However if the bus bar is correctly shrouded where MCBs are missing it’s a C2.

As Westward said, it’s all about personal judgement
 
An exposed live busbar, potentially protected by nothing other than a cutout fuse.... C1 for me all day every day.

Although to be fair for the 10 seconds and pennies in parts I just deal with it there and then.
 
Yes a potential danger which is not the standing of a Code 1.
I think with that argument Westward there would never be a C1 as you could argue that a CU with it's cover left off is only 'potentially' dangerous.
 
Just to add a bit more fuel to the fire. I do remember a thread where there was a discussion about the types of blanking used. Some said that they only use the din rail fixed ones. Ones that need a tool to remove.
So do the blanking plates that just push on need coding? Any small kid could take one off..
 
I think with that argument Westward there would never be a C1 as you could argue that a CU with it's cover left off is only 'potentially' dangerous.
This is my point on the Code definitions. Separate Danger Present and Potentially Dangerous, they walk the same path to a hazard. What is Danger Present, something Potentially Dangerous.
 

Reply to Blanks missing from CU in 2 senarios in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
As the holiday season approaches, PCBWay is thrilled to announce their Christmas & New Year Promotions! Whether you’re an engineer or an...
Replies
0
Views
460
  • Article
Bloody Hell! Wishing you a speedy recovery and hope (if) anyone else involved is ok. Ivan
    • Friendly
    • Like
Replies
13
Views
949
  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
895

Similar threads

  • Question
There is no homework, and I'll never see these photo again.
Replies
3
Views
704
Generally it would depend on the circumstances whether the armour is earthed both ends or not, and not just dependent on whether it's 2 or 3 core...
Replies
9
Views
350

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top