Eicr

[dlt27]

Hi all, I have done a few EICR's before however could do with a bit of advice on what codes you more experienced guys would give these observations;
1 Old 3036 DB made up of wooden base/back. (C3?)
2 Underszed main bond. (C3?)
3 Cooker switch mounted 18" above cooker (C3?)
4 Mutiple cct's in MCB (C3?)
Thanks for any input.

 

[Des 56]

Sorry man. I may have misunderstood. I was talking about for example, 3 separate radial circuits connected to 1 MCB.

You still don't seem to accept the point Mr Rail

If they are connected to one mcb then the three radials become one circuit



get the joke.point/Rail ? lol

 

[Guest125]

But that doesnt matter, you still only have one circuit.

So are you saying that if you have three rooms. Each room has 4 sockets on a seperate radial. If connected all to 1 OCPD then you would class this as 1 final circuit?

 

[Plonker 3]

No just one circuit. Thats all it is.

 

[Guest125]

You still don't seem to accept the point Mr Rail

If they are connected to one mcb then the three radials become one circuit



get the joke.point/Rail ? lol

I get what you are saying but have never heard that explanation before. It suprises me a lot. So in your opinion when would 314.1 come into force?

 

[Guest125]

get the joke.point/Rail ? lol

Post reported..... LOL

 

[Guest125]

No just one circuit. Thats all it is.

I will be honest mate but my brain cannot comprehend that. Computing failure....

 

[Plonker 3]

As defined in Part 2 of the BGB

Circuit- An assembly of electrical equipment supplied from the same origin and protected against overcurrent by the same protective device(s)

 

[Plonker 3]

I get what you are saying but have never heard that explanation before. It suprises me a lot. So in your opinion when would 314.1 come into force?

Unless I am mistaken that reg is about division of installation

 

[Guest125]

As defined in Part 2 of the BGB

Circuit- An assembly of electrical equipment supplied from the same origin and protected against overcurrent by the same protective device(s)

Yes but there is another definition for 'final circuit' as detailed in 314.4.

 

[Guest125]

Unless I am mistaken that reg is about division of installation

I really think it is clear that final circuits should be connected to different circuits.

 

[Andy78]

I will be honest mate but my brain cannot comprehend that. Computing failure....

Then you need to re-calibrate your brain.

Multiple radials from one OCPD are classed as one circuit which is spurred at the OCPD.
Dividing these branches into separate OCPDs would make them individual circuits.
This is by definition, and cannot be anything else.

 

[Guest125]

Unless I am mistaken that reg is about division of installation

This is covered under 314.1 & 314.2.

 

[Plonker 3]

The definition of "final circuit" mentions "circuit" so the definition of circuit needs to be referred to. Which is also covered by 314.4

 

[Guest125]

Then you need to re-calibrate your brain.

Multiple radials from one OCPD are classed as one circuit which is spurred at the OCPD.
Dividing these branches into separate OCPDs would make them individual circuits.
This is by definition, and cannot be anything else.

Nope. We are gonna have to agree to disagree on this one.

 

[Guest125]

Is anyone accepting the cooker switch one?