N
Nigel
For me right now .
Both.
But I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise .. but I'm not yet.
If you need RCDs for basic protection you are in a whole world of trouble and cables in walls is the least of your worries.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Discuss Landlords EICR and t&e sub mains without RCD in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net
For me right now .
Both.
But I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise .. but I'm not yet.
With tt anyhow
With tncs or tns yes its additional... but it's still a requirement really unless someone can show me something that says different.
Accepted.If you need RCDs for basic protection you are in a whole world of trouble and cables in walls is the least of your worries.
Yes sirIs the buried at less than 50mm rule still apply to cables within the prescribed zones?
Yes in the case of TT then it's different. Like I said my argument is solely for buried twin and earth cables less than 50mm deep.For me right now .
Both.
But I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise .. but I'm not yet.
Yes sir
Would there be much point putting a 100ma RCD upfront of one of these sub mains as it still wouldnt meet the 30ma requirement?
in my opinion it would be worth it, especially if it was me that had just put a nail through the cable.
C1 if James’ nail is still sticking out of the cableBut both scenarios would warrant a C3 code?
C1 if James’ nail is still sticking out of the cable
It is a TT earthing system a 100ma device will provide fault protection.Would there be much point putting a 100ma RCD upfront of one of these sub mains as it still wouldnt meet the 30ma requirement?
Reply to Landlords EICR and t&e sub mains without RCD in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net