Phasing nightmare | Page 4 | on ElectriciansForums
  • Thread starter Michael Smith
  • Start date
  • Replies 113
  • Views 9K

Discuss Phasing nightmare in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

I'm currently working on the patterson power cell and cold fusion

Don’t give him any more ideas, what if he’s planning his own Philadelphia experiment?:willy_nilly:
 
your a fool.

it wont pull 100kw.

a 100a main switch is rated for around 23kw.

what makes you think you will pull as much power as lite industry?

dont forget if you need this much power you will need your own transformer and an 11/33kv supply lol

your calculations are way off


thats where you are wrong ...... the equipment is above ground..... the pool is below ground meaning itll need more 'power' to pump the water up
3 x 24KW heating pumps...... 72KW
2 x 3KW filter pumps...... 6KW Krystal Clear Pump and Filter Set 0.95hp pump with 7.9m3 per hour flow rate - Model 3 [Krystal Clear Pump Filter Model3] - ÂŁ345.00 :
1 x water treatment monitor 3KW
5 x dehumidifiers 9KW Meaco 800i Range Pool Dehumidifiers [Meaco 800i] - ÂŁ3,633.27 :
 
There's something called diversity, it's there to take account of the fact that not all appliances will be running at full power at any one time. For example, the heaters will not be running maxed out once the pool is up to temperature, so there's an adjustment to the consumption straight away.
 
i think all this can be sorted by asking everyone to think it through..... i think it CAN be achieved.... BUUUUT <-- cant make it any bigger :/ sorry guys
technology hasnt get achieved the clue to it

you never know with his cold fusion and our noggin's we may just be the first people to achieve space travel.... oh wait thats been done.... damn...... ok..... interstellar space travel and the ability to go faster than the speed of light.... honestly, its not that it CANT be done its just you have to believe there is a way it CAN
 
i think all this can be sorted by asking everyone to think it through..... i think it CAN be achieved.... BUUUUT <-- cant make it any bigger :/ sorry guys
technology hasnt get achieved the clue to it

you never know with his cold fusion and our noggin's we may just be the first people to achieve space travel.... oh wait thats been done.... damn...... ok..... interstellar space travel and the ability to go faster than the speed of light.... honestly, its not that it CANT be done its just you have to believe there is a way it CAN

In which case, perhaps you'd better delay building this house and pool until technology has caught up with your requirements. I think you'll be in for a long wait.
 
i think all this can be sorted by asking everyone to think it through..... i think it CAN be achieved.... BUUUUT <-- cant make it any bigger :/ sorry guys
technology hasnt get achieved the clue to it

you never know with his cold fusion and our noggin's we may just be the first people to achieve space travel.... oh wait thats been done.... damn...... ok..... interstellar space travel and the ability to go faster than the speed of light.... honestly, its not that it CANT be done its just you have to believe there is a way it CAN
AT PRESENT, there is no way to make anything which is 100% efficient, let alone 500%. You can't fit a quart into a pint pot, nor can you get a quart out of a pint pot.
Sorry but there is no way to change the laws of physics. Not yet anyway.
 
true they lose power 'generating' power but the power that is lost isnt MORE than whats available to use
1% loss isn't sufficient to cause the motor to be under-powered and over time cause it to stop
2 MegaWatts minus 1% leaves 1.8 MegaWatts left over. if the motor demands 0.3 MegaWatts to power the generator and the demand from the house is around 1MegaWatts then there is still 0.5MegaWatts unaccounted for.... that's the question..... yes i am a pain in the :censored: and stubborn till i can understand the answer in my own mind.... so please stick with me

Basic sums, pal........2 minus 10% leaves 1.8
 
When we're trying to get you to understand that efficiency greater than 100% is nonsense, the difference between 1% and 10% is not worth mentioning.

what your saying is that the generator will ALWAYS generate 1% less than whats needed? even when the load is less than its MAX load capacity (500KW capacity ~ 100KW demand.... 99KW supplied)
 
No, it will generate what is needed to power the load connected to it as long as that load is less than its max output.
The power input required will always be higher than the power output for any given load.
The difference will be relative to its %efficiency.
 

Reply to Phasing nightmare in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

News and Offers from Sponsors

  • Article
Join us at electronica 2024 in Munich! Since 1964, electronica has been the premier event for technology enthusiasts and industry professionals...
    • Like
Replies
0
Views
299
  • Sticky
  • Article
Good to know thanks, one can never have enough places to source parts from!
Replies
4
Views
810
  • Article
OFFICIAL SPONSORS These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then...
Replies
0
Views
857

Similar threads

Hi, Thanks for that, you learn something new almost every day! Regards Griffey
Replies
5
Views
1K
I got this all wired in and working thanks to the help from James, absolutely top man. Do have a small issue with current imbalance atm, L3...
Replies
10
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top