Why is everybody obsessed with heating their hot water from excess PV?
Before anyone buys a controller, do the mathematics first.
Here is some maths and some hard facts.
Intelligent Immersion Ltd has done a detailed analysis of several of its proportional controllers that have been in service for more than a year, based on logging their power flows. It is concluded that a fair average figure for energy put into an immersion heater is 1400kWhr per year for 4kW PV systems. Based on a gas cost (plus boiler inefficiencies due to short cycling in summer) of 7p per unit that amounts to £100 per year saved. With oil, bought wood, LPG or full priced electricity that might be double. So with a £200 device price it pays itself back in 1-3 years, not including any installation cost (which should be zero for DIY install). That is an excellent payback for a green device with many, such as double glazing and PV, taking much longer. It would be good even at a base 4p per unit gas cost. That is good reason to be obsessed with water heating.
The biggest reason for not exceeding 1400kWh is because the water temperature on summer days reaches its set temperature part way through the day.
Of course there are things that can be done to extract more than 1400kWh out of it such as heat a towel rail, second immersion, underfloor heating, etc, but 2 problems:-
- Our data shows that there is only significant excess export from say Mar to Sept and only then on very sunny days, which are pretty rare in UK. That is not the days when you normally want underfloor heating, etc. A towel rail is about the only summertime use for the heat and personally I never need to heat my towel rails in that period. Battery charging is about the only thing I can think of that can be done with any excess year round.
- It incurs costly additions to the basic immersion application, whose payback will be long as their benefit is small (e.g. due to the short period when they are useful).
So to adapt your car analogy a car that does 60mpg is good. One that does 80mpg is better but not if it costs 50% more to buy, as the extra will never recover itself in saved fuel.
There are some strange claims being made by some in this market area. You can generate very optimistic numbers that lead to marketing statements like “save £250” but only if you assume at least 2 out of 4 of the following factors: 100% of the generation goes into water heating (i.e. no house usage), fuel is >15p, it is a large household using lots of water and is in south of England. It is disingenuous to claim that it applies to all.
For stepped contollers and 1kW immersion elements the payback is much longer.